As organizations entered 2026, cybersecurity teams faced a sobering reality. A persistent botnet campaign, active for nine months, had escalated by weaponizing a critical new vulnerability to target the very edge devices that form the backbone of modern industrial operations. The RondoDox botnet is not just another piece of malware; its evolution and tactics expose a critical weakness in the world’s increasingly connected infrastructure.
This threat directly challenges the foundational security of Industrial Internet of Things (IIoT) environments, where the convergence of information technology (IT) and operational technology (OT) has created a sprawling and often poorly defended attack surface. The urgent question for security leaders is no longer if such automated threats will target industrial assets, but precisely how to protect industrial IoT from botnet attacks with defenses that operate at the same scale and speed as the threats themselves.
How the RondoDox Botnet Exploits IoT Vulnerabilities
The core of the RondoDox threat lies in its aggressive, opportunistic, and automated exploitation strategy.
- The Exploit “Shotgun” Approach: Security researchers describe RondoDox’s method as an “exploit shotgun.” Unlike targeted attacks, it fires a broad spray of over 56 known exploits at internet-facing devices to see what works . This includes vulnerabilities in routers, digital video recorders (DVRs), network video recorders (NVRs), and web servers. Most of these are command injection flaws, allowing the botnet to easily take control .
- Weaponizing Critical New Flaws: In late 2025, RondoDox rapidly incorporated a severe new vulnerability into its arsenal: the React2Shell flaw (CVE-2025-55182). This is a critical, pre-authentication remote code execution vulnerability in React Server Components and Next.js frameworks, with a maximum CVSS score of 10.0 . As of December 2025, over 90,300 instances remained exposed to this flaw globally, with a majority in the United States . RondoDox began actively scanning for and exploiting these vulnerable servers in December, deploying cryptominers and botnet loaders .
- Phased and Persistent Evolution: Analysis shows RondoDox operated in distinct, escalating phases throughout 2025: initial reconnaissance (March-April), daily mass exploitation of web apps and IoT devices (April-June), and finally, large-scale, hourly automated deployment from July onward . This persistent, evolving campaign demonstrates a high level of operational planning behind the automated attacks.
Why Industrial Networks Are Uniquely Vulnerable
The nature of industrial and operational technology environments makes them disproportionately susceptible to threats like RondoDox.
Industrial routers and perimeter devices have become prime targets. Recent research from Forescout Vedere Labs, which analyzed 90 days of honeypot data, found that OT perimeter devices like routers accounted for 67% of all recorded attacks . In these observed attacks, the RondoDox botnet was the most prevalent malware, appearing in 59% of malicious samples . This data confirms that automated botnets are already heavily probing and attacking the gateways to industrial networks.
Table: Top Malware Families Targeting OT Perimeter Devices (90-Day Honeypot Study)
| Malware Family | Prevalence in Samples | Primary Characteristics |
|---|---|---|
| RondoDox | 59% | Fast-expanding exploit set, “shotgun” approach to exploitation. |
| Redtail | 21% | Cryptominer focused on resource theft. |
| ShadowV2 | 6% | Newer botnet focusing on consumer routers. |
Furthermore, the cultural and technical divide between IT and OT teams creates dangerous security gaps. A 2025 Fortinet report revealed that half of OT organizations fell victim to breaches in the previous year, and higher security maturity was directly linked to better outcomes . The “uptime-first” culture of industrial environments often conflicts with the need for timely patching and updates, leaving legacy systems—which cannot easily support modern security protocols—dangerously exposed .
How AI is Reshaping the Threat and the Defense in 2026
The rise of threats like RondoDox coincides with a broader transformation in cybercrime, driven by artificial intelligence.
Attackers are leveraging AI for speed and scale. The cyber underground is industrializing. “AI systems will manage reconnaissance, accelerate intrusion, parse stolen data, and generate ransom negotiations,” notes FortiGuard Labs in its 2026 predictions . This means the time between an initial intrusion and major impact is shrinking from days to minutes, placing a premium on defensive speed . As Ignacio Brarda, Deputy CISO at Everbridge, states, attacks are becoming adaptive: “malware can mutate in order to find the ways to get through the different defense layers” .
Defensively, AI must power context-aware protection. For industrial environments, the most valuable application of AI is not in replacing human operators but in augmenting their ability to see threats. AI-driven analytics can process vast amounts of operational telemetry to identify subtle deviations that signal a compromise in highly deterministic systems . This shifts the paradigm from mere perimeter defense to detecting anomalies in operational behavior itself. The goal is machine-speed defense—a continuous cycle of intelligence, validation, and containment that can match the pace of automated attacks .
How to Protect Industrial IoT from Botnet Attacks: Building a Resilient Defense Posture
Mitigating the risk from automated botnets requires a strategy that acknowledges the unique constraints and critical importance of industrial operations.
- Relentless Asset Visibility and Hardening: You cannot protect what you cannot see. Maintaining a complete, dynamic inventory of all IoT and OT assets is the non-negotiable first step. This must be followed by rigorous hardening: changing all default credentials, disabling unnecessary services, and applying security patches in accordance with operational windows .
- Strategic Network Segmentation: Isolating OT networks from enterprise IT and the public internet is a fundamental control. This involves creating dedicated VLANs for IoT devices and enforcing strict communication policies so that only authorized engineering workstations can interact with critical controllers .
- Adopting a Zero-Trust Mindset for Access: In line with frameworks like ISA/IEC 62443, implement the principle of “never trust, always verify.” This means enforcing strong, multi-factor authentication for all remote access, using jump hosts, and meticulously managing privileges for both human and machine identities .
- Implementing OT-Aware Monitoring and Threat Intelligence: Deploy monitoring solutions that understand industrial protocols. Use curated threat intelligence to block known malicious command-and-control (C2) infrastructure associated with botnets like RondoDox . Focus detection on identifying the behavioral patterns of exploitation and lateral movement within the OT environment.
A Perspective from the Field: An industrial security architect at a mid-sized manufacturing firm (who asked not to be named) shared this insight: “We discovered a legacy wireless router on our plant floor that no one in operations or IT owned up to managing. It was running firmware from 2018. It took a near-miss incident for us to get the budget and mandate for a proper OT asset discovery project. That single, forgotten device could have been our undoing.”
FAQ: RondoDox Botnet and Industrial IoT Security
What is the primary goal of the RondoDox botnet?
While it has been observed dropping cryptocurrency miners, its primary function appears to be building a large, resilient network of compromised devices. It aggressively terminates competing malware on infected devices to maintain sole control, suggesting its value is in the botnet itself, which can be rented out for distributed denial-of-service (DDoS) attacks or used as a proxy network .
Why are IoT devices like routers so hard to secure?
Many consumer and industrial IoT devices are designed to be “set and forget.” They are often unmanaged, rarely updated by end-users, and may have long lifespans with limited vendor support for security patches. Vendors sometimes release patches, but a lack of automated update mechanisms and fear of updates breaking functionality lead to widespread, persistent vulnerabilities .
How does the React2Shell vulnerability (CVE-2025-55182) work?
It is a critical flaw in React Server Components (used by the Next.js framework) where unsafe deserialization of data from HTTP requests allows an unauthenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code on the server. This lets attackers like the RondoDox operators gain full control over vulnerable web applications .
Fast Facts
The RondoDox botnet represents the new normal in 2026: automated, persistent, and quick to exploit both old and new vulnerabilities. Its significant presence in attacks against industrial perimeter devices proves that OT networks are directly in the crosshairs. Defending requires moving beyond traditional IT security to implement OT-focused strategies like comprehensive asset visibility, strong network segmentation, and monitoring that understands industrial behavior.
Stay ahead of evolving industrial threats. Subscribe to our newsletter for monthly analysis on critical infrastructure security, actionable defense insights, and deep dives into the tools and tactics shaping the industrial cybersecurity landscape.
Further Reading & Related Insights
- AI Cybersecurity Threats to IoT Devices → Directly connects to the article’s focus on automated botnet threats and IoT device vulnerabilities.
- Aisuru IoT Botnet DDoS Attack → Explores another botnet campaign, complementing the RondoDox case study with broader IoT attack patterns.
- Audit-Driven IIoT Adoption Crisis → Highlights governance and compliance gaps that leave IIoT deployments exposed to persistent threats.
- IIoT Time-Series Data Corruption from Power Instability in 2025 → Shows how infrastructure instability undermines IIoT reliability, amplifying the risks of botnet exploitation.
- Industrial Wi-Fi Zoning for Reliable IIoT Networks → Provides practical insights into network segmentation and resilience, aligning with defense strategies against botnets.
